<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fair Use Redux</title>
	<link>http://blog.see3.net/2007/05/07/fair-use-redux/</link>
	<description>the blog of See3 Communications</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://blog.see3.net/2007/05/07/fair-use-redux/#comment-2524</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 19:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.see3.net/2007/05/07/fair-use-redux/#comment-2524</guid>
					<description>I heard the NPR story about this video, but did not realize until I saw it here that I saw this video when it got passed around via email at least 2 years ago.  What's interesting about that is even a video that was viral by 2005 standards still did not generate enough attention to drive the content owner to cry infringement.  It was not until YouTube created the environment and the buzz for videos to get such massive traffic, and began to generate revenue from that traffic, that copyright holders have been moved to act.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard the NPR story about this video, but did not realize until I saw it here that I saw this video when it got passed around via email at least 2 years ago.  What&#8217;s interesting about that is even a video that was viral by 2005 standards still did not generate enough attention to drive the content owner to cry infringement.  It was not until YouTube created the environment and the buzz for videos to get such massive traffic, and began to generate revenue from that traffic, that copyright holders have been moved to act.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
